The esteemed Warren Buffett told Berkshire Hathaway at the next shareholders meeting that he âmade the wrong decisionsâ when he refused to invest in Amazon and Google (now Alphabet). Itâs Warren Buffettâs mistake that happened because he adhered to his long-standing investment principles â and this may mean that the time has come to revise the basic ideas of work.
âI had a very, very, very good opinion about him (talking about Jeff Bezos) when we first met, but I underestimated him,â the billionaire said in a CNBC commentary. âIâve always been following Amazon from the very first steps. It seems to me that Bezos did something close to a miracle. But the fact is that when it seems to me that something will become a miracle, I donât invest in it â.
Why did this Warren Buffett mistake take place? Perhaps this lack of opportunity was facilitated by Buffettâs own limited technological knowledge. Bill Gates, according to Buffett, in a personal conversation recommended that he leave the creaky and clumsy Altavista search engine for Google. In addition, the great investor said that âstupidityâ did not allow him to invest in Microsoft in the early stages. In this light, the ignorance of Amazon and Google reflects the investment philosophy that was the basis for the epochal success of Berkshire Hathaway.
Buffett has long encouraged investors to bet solely on enterprises from industries in which they are familiar. And he admitted that when the conversation turned to the two mentioned technological giants, âit would be much more useful if I had some idea of ââthese enterprisesâ.
Why Buffett did not see the potential of the tech giants
But another point in technical investments fundamentally diverges from Buffettâs strategy. He also noted at the meeting that âhe made a mistake, not being able to draw conclusions where I felt that the current prices provide excellent prospects.â This is the result of the Buffett approach, which is based on value investment â the purchase of shares at a price below their real (internal) value.
However, technology companies have been aggressively reassessed by the market for at least 10 years compared to their profits and assets. This comes from the forecast of their full market dominance in the future. Buffett was loyal to companies with monopolistic market positions. But these positions are built differently in a data-based world, in contrast to those industries in which Warren once became the best. Network effects and âfeedback effectsâ act as a new kind of defensive ditch for technical monopolies. But the creation of such âditchesâ requires huge long-term costs. Amazonâs early investors had to overcome years of heavy losses, but after that they came under the tsunami of profit.
But just because pseudo-monopolies are good investment options, you should not think that they are good for society. Regulators still figure out what a monopoly is in the digital age, but more and more critics are calling for restrictions on the size and power of the giants on which Buffett would like to bet.
Read also:Â 3 characteristics and principles in investing from Warren Buffett
Similar articles
- Warren Buffettâs Principles and Investment Approach.
Warren Buffettâs investment success boils down to 3 key characteristics that can be determined at the genetic level. Warren Buffett â One ofâŠ
- Investor Mistakes â 6 Basic Beginner Mistakes
So that investing money does not threaten big losses, we talked about the common mistakes of the investor. Having tried once to invest in stocks and withâŠ
- Mistakes in investing â 17 common mistakes and 5 steps to solve them
CFA Institute (Chartered Financial Analyst) â an international organization for the certification of financial professionals â published common investment errorsâŠ
Why did Warren Buffettâs mistake prevent him from capitalizing on the success of Google?