...

Non-public joint stock companies – NAO

Non-public Joint Stock Companies – NAO are a unique type of domestic company in the Russian Federation, possessing numerous features and advantages. They are legally distinct from standard Joint Stock Companies and benefit from a simplified corporate structure and reduced governance duties. Joint shareholders are individually liable up to the amount of their investment, and are spared the complex legal and financial requirements of a typical Public Joint Stock Company. In addition, they can be established with just one shareholder, avoiding the requirement for public listings, and the potential of hostile takeovers. These features enable NAOs to remain flexible and independent, allowing them to better adapt to changing economic environments.

The content of the article



The abbreviations CJSC and OJSC are familiar even to those who are not related to business, so deciphering them is not difficult. These are different forms of joint-stock companies (JSC) – closed and open, differing from each other in the possibilities of selling shares and managing the company. A few years ago, legislative reform was carried out, giving more correct names to these business entities..

What is NAO

In 2014, definitions regarding the legal form of legal entities were revised. Federal Law No. 99 dated 05/05/2014 amended the law and abolished the concept of a closed joint-stock company. At the same time, a new division was introduced for business entities, distinguishing them by the criteria of openness to third parties and the possibility of third-party participation.

Article 63.3 of the Civil Code (CC) defines new concepts. According to the article, business companies are:

  • Public (software). These are companies whose shares are freely traded in accordance with Law No. 39 of April 22, 1996, “On the Securities Market”. An alternative requirement relating the organization to the category of software is an indication of the public nature in the title.
  • Non-public (BUT). All other non-public.

The legislative wording does not give a clear definition of a non-public society, and is based on an exclusive principle (everything that is not software is BUT). Legally, this is not very convenient, because it creates a heap of wording when trying to define terms. The situation is similar with the establishment of the value of a non-public joint-stock company (NAO). It can only be determined by analogy (NAO is an AO with the signs of BUT), which is also uncomfortable.

But the legal procedure for the transition to new definitions is simple. Law No. 99-ФЗ recognizes by public joint-stock companies all joint-stock companies created before September 1, 2014 and meeting the qualification criteria. And if such a company as of July 1, 2015 has in its charter or title an indication of publicity, but in fact that is not a PJSC, then it is given five years to start an open circulation of securities or to re-register the name. This means that July 1, 2020 is the deadline for the transition to new formulations to be completed by law..

Form of incorporation

Public and non-public joint-stock companies are distinguished according to article 63.3 of the Civil Code. The defining feature is the free circulation of the company’s shares, so it would be a mistake to mechanically translate the old definitions into new ones (for example, to assume that all OJSCs automatically become PJSC). According to the legislation:

  • Public joint-stock companies include not only OJSCs, but also ZAOs that have openly placed bonds or other securities.
  • The category of non-public joint-stock companies includes closed-type joint-stock companies, plus those that do not have shares in circulation. At the same time, the category of non-profit organizations will be even wider – in addition to the NAO, this also includes LLC (limited liability companies).

Given the specific nature of a closed joint-stock company, simplifying the task of concentration of assets in the hands of a group of individuals, combining it into one group with LLC is quite logical. The legislative need to create a category of non-profit organizations becomes very understandable – this is the unification into one group of business companies that exclude outside influence. At the same time, a non-public limited liability company without any difficulties can be transformed into a NAO (the reverse process is also possible).

Civil Code of Russia

The difference between a public joint-stock company and a non-public

When comparing PAO and NAO, it is important to understand that each of them has its own advantages and disadvantages, depending on the specific situation. For example, public joint-stock companies provide more opportunities for attracting investments, but at the same time they are less stable in corporate conflicts than non-public joint-stock companies. The table shows the main differences between the two types of business entities:

Characteristics Public JSC Non-public joint-stock companies
Name (until 1.07.2020 former wording will be recognized by law) Mandatory mention of public status (for example, PJSC Vesna) An indication of the lack of publicity is not required (for example, JSC “Summer”)
Minimum authorized capital, rubles 1000 minimum wages (minimum wage) 100 minimum wage
Number of shareholders Minimum 1, maximum unlimited At least 1, when the number of shareholders begins to exceed 50 people, re-registration is required
Stock Trading Yes No
Possibility of open subscription for placement of securities Yes No
Preemptive acquisition of shares No Yes
Presence of a board of directors (supervisory board) Yes You can not create

Feature and Features

From the point of view of legislation, a non-public joint-stock company is a special category of business entities. Key features include:

  • Admission restrictions. It can only be founders. They are the sole shareholders, as the company’s shares are distributed only among them.
  • The authorized capital has a lower limit of 100 minimum wages, which is formed by depositing property or cash.
  • Registration of a non-public company is preceded by the preparation of not only the charter of the company, but also a corporate agreement between the founders.
  • NAO is managed through a general meeting of shareholders with notarial fixation of the decision.
  • The amount of information that a non-public joint-stock company should post in the public domain is much less than that of other types of joint-stock companies. For example, non-public joint-stock companies, with few exceptions, are exempted from the obligation to publish annual and accounting reports.

Disclosure of information about activities to third parties

The principle of publicity involves posting in the public domain information about the activities of the company. The information that a public joint-stock company should publish in print (or on the Internet) includes:

  • Company Annual Report.
  • Annual accounting reporting.
  • Affiliate List.
  • Statutory documentation of a joint stock company.
  • Share Issue Decision.
  • Shareholder Meeting Notification.

For non-public joint-stock companies, these disclosure obligations apply in an abbreviated form and apply only to organizations with more than 50 shareholders. In this case, in publicly available sources:

  • Annual report;
  • Annual financial statements.

Certain information about a non-public joint-stock company is entered into the Unified State Register of Legal Entities (USRLE). These data include:

  • information on the value of assets at the last reporting date;
  • information on licensing (including suspension, re-registration and termination of a license);
  • notification of the introduction of supervision as determined by the arbitral tribunal;
  • subject to publication in accordance with Articles 60 and 63 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation (notifications of reorganization or liquidation of a legal entity).

Girl with a laptop

Charter

In connection with legislative changes caused by the emergence of new organizational and legal forms (public and non-public joint-stock companies), the joint-stock company must conduct a reorganization procedure with amendments to the charter. For this, a board of shareholders is convened. It is important that the introduced changes do not contradict the Federal Law No. 146 of July 27, 2006 and must contain a mention of the non-public organization.

The typical structure of the charter of a non-public joint-stock company is determined by Articles 52 and 98 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, as well as by Law No. 208 of December 26, 1995 “On Joint-Stock Companies”. The mandatory information that should be indicated in this document includes:

  • name of the company, its location;
  • information about the placed shares;
  • information on the authorized capital;
  • amount of dividends;
  • procedure for holding a general meeting of shareholders.

Organization management and governing bodies

In accordance with applicable law, the charter of a joint-stock company must contain a description of the organizational structure of the company. The same document should consider the powers of the governing bodies and determine the decision-making procedure. The organization of management depends on the size of the company, it is multilevel and has different types:

  • General Meeting of Shareholders;
  • Supervisory Board (Board of Directors);
  • collegial or sole executive body (board or director);
  • revision Commission.

Law No. 208-FZ defines the general meeting of the highest governing body. With its help, shareholders exercise their right to manage a joint-stock company by participating in this event and voting on issues on the agenda. Such a meeting is annual or extraordinary. The charter of the company will determine the boundaries of competence of this body (for example, some issues can be resolved at the level of the supervisory board).

Due to organizational difficulties, the general meeting cannot solve operational issues – for this, a supervisory board is elected. The issues that this structure addresses include:

  • prioritization of the activities of a non-public joint-stock company;
  • recommendations on the size and procedure for paying dividends;
  • increase in the authorized capital of the joint-stock company through the placement of additional shares;
  • approval of major financial transactions;
  • convocation of a general meeting of shareholders.

The executive body may be sole or collective. This structure is accountable to the general meeting and is responsible for the improper performance of its duties. At the same time, the competence of this body (especially in a collegial form) includes the most difficult issues of the current activity of a non-public joint-stock company:

  • development of financial and business plan;
  • approval of documentation on the activities of the company;
  • consideration and decision-making on the conclusion of collective bargaining agreements;
  • harmonization of internal labor regulations.

Issue and placement of shares

The process of registration of a joint stock company is accompanied by the issuance of special securities. They are called shares, and according to Law No. 39-FZ, they give the owner the right:

  • receive dividends – part of the company’s profit;
  • participate in the process of managing a joint-stock company (if the security is voting);
  • ownership of a part of property after liquidation.

The issue of securities is called an issue. Moreover, shares may have:

  • documentary form confirming ownership with a certificate;
  • non-documentary, when the record of the owner is made in a special register (in this case, the concepts of “securities” and “issue shares” are conditional).

Issue of shares

After the issue follows the distribution (placement) of shares among the owners. The process is fundamentally different for PAO and NAO, realizing different ways to profit from these companies. A wide distribution channel of securities in the first case implies more careful control of activities by state bodies. The table shows the differences between public and non-public joint-stock companies in the placement of shares:

Process Public JSC Non-public company
Registration of the issue of shares It is necessary to register a public securities issue prospectus (a special document with information about the issuer and the issue of shares). Charter and founders agreement required
Circle of shareholders Is not limited No more than 50 people
Placement of shares Publicly on the stock exchange and other securities markets Among shareholders (or under their control), there is no open subscription and free circulation on exchanges
Possibility of a shareholder to alienate (sell) shares Under the control of other AO participants Loose

Certification of decisions of AO and maintenance of the register of shareholders

The general meeting of shareholders is the supreme governing body of the company, which determines the further development of the organization. At the same time, legally correct compilation of the protocol and assurance of the decisions taken, which relieves the participants, members of the board and the head from mutual claims and disputes about forgery, is of great importance. According to Law No. 208-FZ, the protocol documentation must contain:

  • time and place of the general meeting of shareholders of a non-public joint-stock company;
  • the number of votes owned by owners of voting shares;
  • the total number of votes of shareholders who participate;
  • indication of the chairman, the bureau, the secretary, the agenda.

Calling the services of a notary public will make the protocol more secure and increase the level of reliability of this document. This specialist must attend the meeting in person and record:

  • the fact of making specific decisions specified in the minutes of the meeting;
  • number of shareholders of non-public joint-stock company present.

An alternative to contacting a notary will be the services of a registrar who maintains a register of shareholders. The procedure and procedure for confirmation in this case will be similar. According to the law, from October 1, 2014, maintaining the register of shareholders became possible only on a professional basis. For this, joint-stock companies must turn to the services of companies that have a specialized license. Independent maintenance of the register is punishable by a fine of up to 50,000 rubles for management, and up to 1,000,000 rubles for legal entities.

Organizational Change

The reform of joint stock companies, begun in 2014-2015 by Law No. 99-FZ, is due to be completed in 2020. By this time, all official company names should be re-registered in the manner prescribed by law. Depending on the availability of publicity, the former CJSC and OJSC are transformed into PJSC and JSC. Indication of non-publicity by law is not mandatory, therefore, the abbreviation NAO may not be used in the official details of the company, and the presence of shares in free circulation allows you to do without reducing PJSC.

Legislation permits a change in ownership from PAO to NAO and vice versa. For example, in order to convert a Non-Public Joint-Stock Company, it is necessary:

  • Increase authorized capital if it is less than 1000 minimum wages.
  • Conduct an inventory and audit.
  • To develop and approve the amended version of the charter and related documents. If necessary, the legal form is renamed to PJSC (by law, this is not mandatory if there are shares in free float).
  • Re-register.
  • Transfer property to a new legal entity.

Preparation of constituent documents

Particular attention when re-registering NAO should be given to the proper preparation of documentation. Organizationally, this process breaks down into two stages:

  • The preparatory part. It implies filling out an application in the form of P13001, holding a meeting of shareholders and preparing a new charter.
  • Registration. At this stage, the details of the company change (a new print and letterhead will be required), about which counterparties should be warned.

Documents on the table

Advantages and disadvantages

If we compare the capabilities of PAO and NAO, then each of them has its pros and cons. But, depending on the specific business situation, this or that option will be suitable. Non-public joint stock companies have the following advantages:

  • The minimum size of the authorized capital is 100 minimum wages for the NAO (in Public AO this figure is 10 times higher). But this plus immediately becomes a minus, when compared with the same indicator for an LLC – 10,000 rubles, which makes the form of a limited liability company more accessible for small businesses.
  • A simplified form of acquiring shares. State registration of the contract of sale is not required, you only need to make changes to the registry.
  • Greater freedom in managing the company. This is a consequence of a limited circle of stockholders..
  • Disclosure restrictions. Not all shareholders want information about their share in the authorized capital or the number of shares to be accessible to a wide circle of people..
  • Less risky investments for investors than in the case of a public joint-stock company. The lack of open stock trading is a good protection against the undesirable possibility of buying a controlling stake in a third party.
  • Lower paperwork costs than PAO. Requirements for non-public documentation are not as serious as for the one to be made public..

Compared to a public joint-stock company, non-public joint-stock companies have a number of disadvantages. These include:

  • Closed nature greatly limits the ability to attract third-party investments.
  • The process of creating a company is complicated by the need for state registration of the issue of shares (in addition, this leads to an increase in the authorized capital).
  • Decision making may be in the hands of a small group of people..
  • Limitations on the number of shareholders of 50 people compared to an unlimited number of public JSC.
  • Difficulties in withdrawing from the membership and selling their shares.
Rate the article
( No ratings yet )
Recommender Great
Tips on any topic from experts
Comments: 4
  1. Magnolia

    What are the main differences between non-public joint stock companies and other types of companies? Is it advantageous for investors to invest in non-public joint stock companies like NAO?

    Reply
  2. Piper

    What are the advantages of being a non-public joint stock company (NAO) compared to other types of companies, and how does it affect the ownership structure and decision-making processes within the company?

    Reply
    1. Zoey Davidson

      One advantage of being a non-public joint stock company (NAO) is that it allows for greater flexibility in ownership structure. Unlike publicly traded companies, which have numerous shareholders, a NAO can have a limited number of owners. This can streamline decision-making processes as there are fewer stakeholders involved, leading to faster and more efficient decision-making.

      Another advantage is that NAOs have the ability to remain privately held, allowing for greater control over the company. This means that decision-making power remains in the hands of a select group of owners, who can align their interests and make decisions that may be in the best interest of the company’s long-term goals, without the influence or pressure from a large number of shareholders.

      Additionally, NAOs are not subject to the same level of regulations and reporting requirements as publicly traded companies. This can reduce administrative burdens and costs associated with compliance and disclosure obligations.

      Overall, as a non-public joint stock company, the advantages lie in greater flexibility, control, and potentially faster decision-making processes, which can be beneficial in adapting to changing market conditions and pursuing long-term growth strategies.

      Reply
  3. Josiah Foster

    What are the main advantages and disadvantages of investing in non-public joint stock companies (NAOs)? How do they differ from publicly traded companies? Are NAOs subject to the same regulatory requirements and disclosures as public companies?

    Reply
Add comments